Well Plugging and Abandonment

By M. Brian McMahon
 
 
THE PROBLEM OF IDLE AND LEAKING CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS WELLS

What can a landowner, who signed a crude oil lease with an oil company, do to rid his or her property of crude oil wells that have not been producing crude oil for years?

What can a landowner do to protect his or her property from a neighbor’s crude oil wells that are contaminating the landowner’s property with oil and salt water?

Consider the following cases.

Case One: Mr. Harris owns property containing several crude oil
 
wells.  Several years ago, he signed a lease with a crude oil company that gave the crude oil company the right to drill and produce crude oil and natural gas in return for royalties.  It has been some time since he received a check for crude oil royalties.  It looks as though the crude oil wells are no longer producing crude oil and he has not seen any of the crude oil company’s employees on the site for a long time.  He wants the crude oil wells removed now that production has ceased because he believes that his property would be more valuable without the wells.  He wants to build condos or an office building on the property or maybe sell the property to a developer.  He fears that the crude oil wells might eventually leak and cause damage to his property.  He worries even more that he might even be sued if the crude oil wells leak and cause damage to neighboring property.
 

Case Two: Farmer Hoecker’s property is next to property that contains several leaking crude oil wells.  From time to time, some sort of sludge oozes from the neighbor’s property onto his.  The sludge has ruined Farmer Hoecker’s crops.  The cost to cleanup the sludge on his property is expensive because he has to remove a layer of topsoil.  He especially fears that gas could escape from leaking wells and explode.  It does not look as though anyone is going to take care of the problem.   

The situations described are not uncommon in California.  As crude oil production continues to tail off because of depletion of reserves, a growing problem for California is what to do with the crude oil wells that are no longer productive but are left unattended.  At best, the wells are an eyesore.  At worst, the wells are creating or threaten to create environmental hazards.  The Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) of the California Department of Conservation is the State agency that oversees crude oil wells and natural gas wells.  The DOGGR presently lists over 18,000 idle crude oil wells and over 400 orphan crude oil wells in California.  The DOGGR considers a well to be idle if it has not produced crude oil or natural gas for six consecutive months of continuous operation during the last five or more years.  An orphan well is one that is not only idle but also lacks any known operator or responsible party to plug it.  Undoubtedly, there are more idle and orphan wells that are not known to the DOGGR. Operators of crude oil and natural gas wells are required by law to report to DOGGR all of their idle wells.  But some operators do not report all of their idle wells, because they have to pay an annual fee for each idle well they report.


OBTAINING RELIEF FROM THE DOGGR

Mr. Harris and Farmer Hoecker may be able to obtain some relief from the DOGGR.  The DOGGR has wide-ranging supervisory authority over the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of crude oil and natural gas wells and attendant facilities.  It has a mandate to prevent damage to life, health, property and natural resources and to increase the production of crude oil and natural gas.

In order to prevent damage to life, health, property and natural resources,  DOGGR regulations set out very stringent requirements for plugging and abandonment of crude oil and natural gas wells and require that a DOGGR employee inspect all wells that have been plugged and abandoned to insure that DOGGR’s requirements have been met.  Plugging and abandonment of crude oil wells can be expensive.

The DOGGR has good reason for its stringent requirements.  Unsealed wells may permit the migration of various fluids such as hydrocarbons and salt water to flow into underground fresh water sources and surface waters.  Crude oil wells that leak below the surface can ruin oil and gas bearing strata causing damage to neighboring oil and gas wells.  Leaking crude oil wells can cause great damage to crops and livestock. They can injure people directly, particularly if escaping gases ignite and explode.  Even crude oil wells that do not presently constitute a danger or do not presently cause damage eventually may, unless they are properly plugged and abandoned.

One possible remedy for someone in Farmer Hoecker’s position is to file a written complaint with the DOGGR requesting the DOGGR to order his neighbor to repair the leaking wells.  The DOGGR has the authority to order wells to be repaired and to impose a fine, not to exceed $5000, for failure to follow its orders.  The DOGGR does not have any authority, however, to require crude oil well operators to pay damages to Farmer Hoecker that were caused by their leaking wells.  Farmer Hoecker may be able to convince the DOGGR to order that the wells on his neighbor’s property be repaired, but he cannot obtain damages from the DOGGR for injury to his person and property caused by the leaking crude oil wells. 

One possible remedy for Mr. Harris is to file a written request with the DOGGR for an order that the wells on his property be plugged and abandoned.  The DOGGR has the authority to order that deserted wells be plugged and abandoned.  That authority, however, is limited.  First, in order for the DOGGR to order a well to be plugged and abandoned, the well must be deserted.  The DOGGR has no authority to order an operator to plug and abandon crude oil wells that are idle, but not abandoned.  The requirements for a rebutable presumption of desertion are set out in a statute.  If an operator of a lease pays a fee every year for its idle crude oil wells, the DOGGR does not consider the wells deserted even if there is no production from the wells.  So the DOGGR has no authority to order an operator to plug and abandon the wells on Mr. Harris’ property as long as the operator continues to pay the annual fees.

Second, the DOGGR is further limited because its authority to order plugging and abandonment of wells extends only to operators who operated the lease on or after January 1, 1996.  But the wells may have ceased operating before 1996, and so there simply is no operator whom the DOGGR has authority over.  Or the DOGGR may be able to identify someone who was an operator of the lease after January 1, 1996, but that operator may have gone bankrupt or simply not have the financial means of plugging and abandoning the wells.  If the DOGGR cannot locate anyone who was an operator of the lease on or after January 1, 1996 with the financial ability to plug and abandon the wells, DOGGR does not have any authority to order someone who was an operator of the lease before 1996 to plug and abandon the crude oil wells.  If there are no operators on or after January 1, 1996 who have the financial ability to plug and abandon the crude oil wells on the lease, the DOGGR may not be able to give Mr. Harris the relief he wants. The DOGGR has no authority to order mineral rights owners who collected royalties, but who never operated the crude oil wells, to plug and abandon them. 

Another possible remedy is to ask the DOGGR to plug and abandon the wells.  The DOGGR has the authority to plug and abandon hazardous and deserted wells if there is no operator who operated the wells after January 1, 1996.  A hazardous well is one that has been determined to be a potential danger to life, health, or natural resources.  The problem with this solution to Mr. Harris’ problem is that the DOGGR has only $1 million to spend on plugging and abandonment each year.  Not surprisingly given the cost of plugging and abandoning wells, the DOGGR has enough funds to plug and abandon only a very limited number of wells each year.

In sum, the DOGGR presents only a very limited solution to the growing problem of crude oil wells that caused damages to people and property and wells that sit idle long after they have ceased producing crude oil and natural gas.  The landowners and others who seek to force non-operating wells to be plugged and abandoned and leaking wells to be repaired may need to look elsewhere for a solution.

 
 
OBTAINING RELIEF FROM THE COURTS
 
If Mr. Harris cannot get relief through the DOGGR, he may be able to take legal action through the courts. Mr. Harris may have causes of action for breach of contract, or even fraud and trespass against the lessee oil company.  He should look to his lease agreement to determine what remedies he may have against the crude oil company to plug and abandon non-operating wells on his property and to remove other facilities that were part of the crude oil operations.  Oil and gas leases typically contain a provision imposing on the oil company lessee the obligation to plug and abandon wells when the lessee is no longer maintaining production in commercial or paying quantities.   One  indication  that  the  production  is  no  longer in  commercial  or  paying  quantities,  though not conclusive,  is
if the lessee has listed the wells on the lease with the DOGGR as
 
idle wells.  If the wells have not been producing crude oil or natural gas in the last six months, then they may be at the end of their commercial production.
 
Many legal complications may arise in Mr. Harris’ quest to force the lessee to plug and abandon crude oil wells.  The lessee is not without defenses to a demand by a lessor such as Mr. Harris to plug and abandon the crude oil wells on the lessor’s property.  In most cases, the lessee is in a better position than the lessor, who typically has no experience in the oil and gas industry, to determine whether a presently idle crude oil well can become profitable once again.  Crude oil wells may be idle because of some temporary problem, such as the need to rework or redrill the wells to extend or increase their production.  In some cases, the lessee may legitimately defend its decision not to plug and abandon its wells on the basis that crude oil prices are expected to improve so as to once again make the wells profitable.  The lessee’s decision whether and when to plug and abandon wells will depend on a number of factors including whether the wells can be reworked, whether the wells can be extended by additional drilling into a different crude oil or natural gas producing zone, or whether the wells can become profitable by the use of new technology.  If a lessee can establish that wells can become profitable in the foreseeable future, the lessee is not under an obligation to plug and abandon the wells because of the mere fact that they are presently idle.  Also, wells that are no longer productive can, nonetheless, contribute to the crude oil production in the lease by serving as injection wells or waste water disposal wells.

More complications may arise in Mr. Harris’ quest to force the lessee to plug and abandon wells that are no longer producing crude oil if they are part of an oil and gas unit.  If a lease on which a well sits is part of a unit, wells that no longer produce crude oil or natural gas can still can make a useful contribution to the profits of the unit if they can be used as injection wells to increase production of crude oil from other wells in the unit or used as waste water disposal wells.  Whether the lessor may force the lessee to plug and abandon wells sitting on the lessor’s property or whether the lessee may continue to maintain wells will depend on the facts of each situation.

Farmer Hoecker is in a different position than Mr. Harris, because he never had any lease agreement with an oil company and never received any royalties from crude oil and natural gas production.  If leaking wells on a neighboring property cause damages to Farmer Hoecker’s property, Farmer Hoecker may bring a lawsuit alleging common law causes of action, such as trespass, nuisance, negligence, strict liability and other tort theories.  In such a lawsuit, Farmer Hoecker can seek damages to the his property and an injunction requiring that the leaking wells be either repaired or plugged and abandoned.

Who may Farmer Hoecker sue?  We have seen that the DOGGR’s authority extends only to operators.  But persons injured by leaking crude oil wells are not so limited.  If there is no operator or former operator still around to fix leaking crude oil wells, persons injured by leaking wells may sue the owners of properties that contain leaking crude oil and gas wells, even if the owner did nothing more than collect royalties.  If the lease on which the leaking crude oil wells sit is part of a unit, the injured party may sue other persons who were working interest owners of the unit.


Conclusion

Mr. Harris’ and Farmer Hoecker’s experiences with idle wells are all too familiar in California thanks to decreasing crude oil and natural gas production and urbanization of the State.  The DOGGR can provide some relief and that should be the first avenue for relief.  But DOGGR’s authority is limited and they should consider using the courts to obtain the relief they need and deserve.
 
 
 
 
This Bulletin is intended to convey general information and does not constitute legal advice.  The attorney listed above would be pleased to discuss in detail the information in this Bulletin and its application to your situation.  We welcome your comments and suggestions.
 
The Law Offices of M. Brian McMahon
626 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90017-3209
 
Telephone:  213.628.9800
Facsimile:  213.622.6029
 
E-mail Us
 
 
« close »